Page Nav


Classic Header




The social instrument of the superior mind for cooperation - God hypothesis IV.

 The working tool of the superior mind in the case of humanity is the individual human being, and its working method is to indirectly infl...

 The working tool of the superior mind in the case of humanity is the individual human being, and its working method is to indirectly influence the consciousness of a suitable person from the background to achieve the modification of the behavior of the entire human society to recognize the value of the mind, to achieve to act for its protection, and ultimately, to reach the level of the superior mind

Who can become the tool of a superior mind to work with?

Influencing through the experiences that the superior mind provides for a subordinate level of mind must be an indirect contact between the superior and the subordinate, so the suitable person must be able to interpret these experiences in the right way, and through his or her mind influenced by these experiences, can take the right actions to impact the behavior of society. A person who can give up the pursuit of his or her own goals, who can accept the external will manifested as fate, and who can surrender his or her will to the superior mind is the one who can accomplish this task.

The presupposition of the presence of the will of the superior mind is the motivation for the subordinate mind to fulfill the task and try to change the behavior of society. However, the expression of the presence of the superior mind to pursue personal interests in order to influence individual or social behavior is typically a subordinate form of intellectual behavior. The realization of personal gain in pursuit of the supposed intention of a superior mind is, in fact, a highly probable presumptive sign of the endeavor of a subordinate mind.

The purpose of the superior mind is to promote cooperative behavior. Sustained cooperative behavior in a society of mind-bearing individuals can only be based on the free will of the individual members of the society. The presence of exclusionary intentions or intentions that restrict free will cannot be a form of the intention of a superior mind.

The relationship between a suitable subordinate and the superior mind necessarily cannot be reciprocal. Any assertion of a mutual personal relationship, any event that supposedly proves the existence of a reciprocal connection, is only mystification and runs the risk of constructing mythology. Mythology, the stories of events that are supposed to be the activity of a superior mind, can, in the positive case, emphasize and accentuate the work of the superior mind, but mythology can, in the negative case, when people invent stories about the will of God, divert the activity of the subordinate mind from the purpose intended by the superior mind. The formation of various religious mythologies are typical examples of these dangers.

The superior mind cannot reveal itself in its reality to the subordinate mind, but the superior mind can influence the will of a subordinate mind by its ability to provide experiences according to its method of operation. In order to accomplish the will of the superior mind, the person used by the superior mind must perform actions that are recognized and noticed by society, while the person's actions indicate the direction of behavior to society that the superior mind intends for the protection of the mind, the attainment of the superior level, and the ability to cooperate mutually.

The purpose of the activity of the superior mind is to influence the highest level of the subordinate organism, which in the case of humanity is society. The superior mind may use the members of society as a working tool, but its purpose is to influence the intellectual level of society as a whole. Human beings are the working tool of the superior mind, but the object of its work is society. Therefore, what is important to the superior mind is not the fate of individual human beings, but the formation of society, and therefore it can even influence society through human tragedies. At the same time, a qualified intellect at any level can be a value to be preserved by the superior mind. 

A suitable person chosen by the superior mind can feel the external guidance of his or her own will, but the superior mind cannot manifest itself to the subordinate mind. If the chosen person declares his or her relationship with the higher intellect to society, which exists in reality but acts hidden to that person, the person's actions may be more effective in influencing society, but the person's activity will certainly be confronted by members of society who differ in will, and the chosen person's efforts may appear to be unsuccessful.

However, the actions of the person leave their mark on society even when the person is no longer present, while the direction of his or her activity of influencing society towards the attainment of a higher level of mind, even using human thinking that builds mythology, can also continue in different social memes, i.e. different religions could arise

Although this method of attaining a higher level of mind through the guidance of a superior mind may be fraught with numerous obstacles and pitfalls, it may be the only suitable method for forming a subordinate mind to attain the superior level of intellect.

Mankind's progress toward the development of the level of the superior mind must necessarily be made by human persons whose lives and activities set an example, whose teachings decisively influence human behavior toward the recognition of the appreciation of the value of the mind and the attainment of the goal of its protection, in order to promote the dominance of behavior conducive to the cooperative relationship among the superior minds.

This is how a superior mind can work with a subordinate mind. This can be the way for a subordinate mind to reach the superior level, catalyzed by a superior mind.

No comments